FOI/202400394243 · FOI/EIR · partially withheld
Correspondence with colleges regarding Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC): EIR release
Information requested
All correspondence between Scottish Government ministers and officials and colleges around the issue of RAAC.
Response
As the information you have requested is 'environmental information' for the purposes of the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004 (EIRs), we are required to deal with your request under those Regulations. We are applying the exemption at section 39(2) of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA), so that we do not also have to deal with your request under FOISA.
This exemption is subject to the 'public interest test'. Therefore, taking account of all the circumstances of this case, we have considered if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption. We have found that, on balance, the public interest lies in favour of upholding the exemption, because there is no public interest in dealing with the same request under two different regimes. This is essentially a technical point and has no material effect on the outcome of your request.
I enclose a copy of one document which falls within the scope of your request. However, most correspondence with colleges on the subject of RAAC has been carried out by the Scottish Funding Council. You may wish, therefore to contact the Scottish Funding Council at Apex 2, 97 Haymarket Terrace, Edinburgh, EH12 5HD or email enquiries@sfc.ac.uk and they may be able to help you.
About FOI
The Scottish Government is committed to publishing all information released in response to Freedom of Information requests. View all FOI responses at http://www.gov.scot/foi-responses.
Detected exemption language
We are applying the exemption at section 39(2) of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA), so that we do not also have to deal with your request under FOISA. This exemption is subject to the 'public interest test'. Therefore, taking account of all the circumstances of this case, we have considered if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption. We have found that, on balance, the public interest lies in favour of upholding the exemption, because there is no public interest in dealing with the same request under two different regimes.