Back to index Original on gov.scot

202200298921 · FOI/EIR · partially withheld

A90/A96 Haudagain Improvement scheme: EIR release

Published
2023-11-10
Received
2022-05-06
Responded
2022-05-26
Directorate
Topic
Public sector
Exemptions
39(2)

Information requested

Please may i request an up to date list of contractors, subcontractors and suppliers that have or will be involved with the A90/A96 Haudagain Improvement scheme.

We are applying the exemption at section 39(2) of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA), so that we do not also have to deal with your request under FOISA.

This exemption is subject to the ‘public interest test’. Therefore, taking account of all the circumstances of this case, we have considered if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption. We have found that, on balance, the public interest lies in favour of upholding the exemption, because there is no public interest in dealing with the same request under two different regimes. This is essentially a technical point and has no material effect on the outcome of your request.

Response

The principal consultant involved with the overall design of the A92/A96 Haudagain Improvement scheme:

Jacobs Consultancy UK Ltd/ Jacobs Engineering/ Jacobs U.K. Limited

The following list of suppliers were used by the principal consultant to provide services related to the development of the scheme:

Item Supplier Provided LIDAR data to inform development of the scheme's conceptual design. Bluesky International Ltd Provided data on species, habitats and sites of interest which informed the environmental impact assessments. North East Scotland Biological Records Centre Provided meteorological data to inform the scheme's conceptual design. Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling Ltd Provided CCTV surveys of the existing Scatter Burn culverted watercourse to inform the scheme's conceptual design. Drainflow (Aberdeen) Ltd Provided rendering/animation of the 3D model for the proposed scheme. Rewind FX Ltd (now Magnopus) Undertook trial trenches to identify location of historic buildings and inform the environmental impact assessments. Headland Archaeology Ltd

Further consultation work also undertaken by:

CEEQUAL Ltd

For geotechnical and ground investigation work the following contractors have been used:

Aecom/ Aecom Infrastructure & Environment Uk Ltd Environmental Reclamation Services Ltd Scottish Water Soil Engineering Geoservices Limited URS Infrastructure and Environment UK Ltd

For provision and installation of traffic counting services:

Amey OW Ltd

For DMRB traffic and economic assessment audit:

CH2M Hill United Kingdom

For Traffic Survey services:

Sky High Technology

For Diversionary Works:

BT Openreach Vodafone SGN SSE Scottish Water City Fibre

For the provision of legal services:

Morton Fraser

For land valuation and land compensation negotiation services:

Valuation Office Agency

For the provision of communication services:

The BIG Partnership Limited TMP Worldwide Limited APS Group (Scotland) Limited

For demolition and refurbishment services:

Environtec Limited George Beattie & Sons Ltd.

The project contractor awarded main construction contract to build the new dual carriageway:

Farrans Construction

Please see information on further subcontractors, suppliers and consultants who have been engaged by the main works project contractor on the A92/A96 Haudagain Improvement in Annex A.

About FOI

The Scottish Government is committed to publishing all information released in response to Freedom of Information requests. View all FOI responses at http://www.gov.scot/foi-responses.

Detected exemption language

We are applying the exemption at section 39(2) of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA), so that we do not also have to deal with your request under FOISA. This exemption is subject to the ‘public interest test’. Therefore, taking account of all the circumstances of this case, we have considered if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption. We have found that, on balance, the public interest lies in favour of upholding the exemption, because there is no public interest in dealing with the same request under two different regimes.

Attachments

Similar releases