Back to index Original on gov.scot

FOI/202500464174 · FOI · partially withheld

Correspondence relating to memoirs of Former First Minister: FOI release

Published
2025-06-09
Received
2025-04-30
Responded
2025-05-19
Directorate
Communications and Ministerial Support Directorate
Topic
Public sector
Exemptions
33(1), 38(1)

Information requested

All email correspondence between Nicola Sturgeon and the Scottish Government since 28 March 2023, including but not limited to the Permanent Secretary, relating to her memoir. For example, this should include all correspondence containing the phrase “memoir”, “book”, “Frankly” and “Pan Macmillan”.

Response

Material considered relevant to your request has been identified and is set out in the Annex to this letter. However, in this instance we are unable to provide some of the information, which has been redacted, because exemptions under section 33(1)(b) (Commercial interests) and section 38(1)(b) (Personal data) applies to it. The former exemption is subject to the ‘public interest test’. Therefore, taking account of all the circumstances of this case, we have considered if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption. We have found that, on balance, the public interest lies in favour of upholding the exemption.

About FOI

The Scottish Government is committed to publishing all information released in response to Freedom of Information requests. View all FOI responses at https://www.gov.scot/foi-responses.

Detected exemption language

However, in this instance we are unable to provide some of the information, which has been redacted, because exemptions under section 33(1)(b) (Commercial interests) and section 38(1)(b) (Personal data) applies to it. The former exemption is subject to the ‘public interest test’. Therefore, taking account of all the circumstances of this case, we have considered if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption. We have found that, on balance, the public interest lies in favour of upholding the exemption.

Attachments

Similar releases